The phenomenon of concertation and social dialogue represents a form of integration between the two great powers operating within the framework of the labor relations system, the regulatory power and the legal-social power of collective autonomy, hence the transformation of institutions is necessary given the social changes that are being experienced.
A
Once again the purposes are renewed. One of the first to have in
account should be to bet on providing greater maturation to
democratic systems of participation. Furthermore, the demand for
This type of process becomes more latent when it is detected that
on the one hand, it is necessary to harmonize the satisfaction of rights and
private desires claimed by individuals and groups and, on the other,
respond to the functional needs of the system. In fact, the
dialogue becomes necessary to establish a specific form of
government, designing an ideal or hypothetical situation in which
abstracts reality to, starting from its concrete description,
attempt to justify free submission to a governmental body,
given that power is only legitimate if it is consented to by each
individuality, especially if you can be part of it as
modulator and planner of norms.
TO
Through these agreements, commitments are made aimed at
frame a behavior, through joint effort, with the
purpose of proceeding to overcome economic difficulties
and the conduct of social relations for the benefit of
general interests. This practice corresponds to a type of policy
of social agreement in which the protagonists agree on their
willingness to face different situations. The foundation of
concertation, dialogue and negotiation rests on the existence
of intermediate groups in society with interests, rights and purposes
own, endowed with collective autonomy, self-regulate their relationships
professionals and seek to influence the direction of policies
economic and social that political power takes.
Now
Well, social concertation can be presented from two points
point of view: as a new form of interventionism or as a new
form of collective bargaining, understanding it from a conception
wide. Because social dialogue emerges as one of the mechanisms
to avoid the probable conflict derived from the management of the
pluralism in democratic societies. Thus, organizations
Through consensus, they begin to have the role of participants in
place of mere spectators. Therefore, the consultation processes
necessarily affect the exercise of power, since they imply
that choosing an option that constitutionally corresponds to the
Public Administration, subjects you to a negotiation between it and
social actors, in order to achieve consensus, not only of
parliamentary order, but political and social order, trusting in the force
organization to make up for the possible lack of legitimacy.
This
option as an instrument is justified if we look at its concept
broad and comprehensive of all forms of treatment and relationship of
social actors about the conflict and the fact that the development of
Collective bargaining goes beyond traditional definitions,
that point to the bilateral and autonomous procedure aimed at
enter into a regulatory agreement for the determination of
conditions determined as a solution to collective conflicts
existing. Therefore, they must be understood under the search threshold
agreements for governance, consolidation of systems
democratic processes of participation and the transformation of
economic and sociopolitical structures to assume the search for
social equality in the field of opportunities. Because the
Societies change and, with it, their institutions. Although, perhaps,
not at the same pace.
José Miguel González Hernández
Director of Consulting Corporation 5, Analysis and Strategies
Sources:
